
Breaking for cover
Brought by what into this solitude you savour as if before ne engineering
or a lm whose language you don’t understand so appreciate the more,
rstly, the pieces of ribbon which ick up and contain rough and ready translations
and so have come to bring you to, secondly, a new understanding of characters,
however articulate, as always sketchily-drawn in the nal estimation,
they could be gures in an animation, a clever hammer,
or men and women reduced to exaggerated eyes and stylised hair,
yet still you feel warm towards them, men like pictures, women like pictures,
humanised by rehumanisation as reduction, and so both disappear and become present
in approximation, if it is ‘yet’, if it is ‘still’, strong as-if-emotions, you’re attracted, say,
or repulsed, or wouldn’t trust them with your keys, (what were they thinking,
they weren’t thinking, it’s all a presenting of shapes),
or you might be about to share faithfully a single carton of milk
and decide against it, they’re human in a small spectrum of response
and that choreographed look made you think ‘one and a half times’,
but yes just shapes, moving, stopping for a duration, touching,
you’ve learnt and absorbed the visual grammar and, thirdly, that’s us, too,
because it’s not just because this kind of lm is, naturally, read as much as viewed
(to the extent, to compensate, you risk for a few seconds not reading the text,
and just look, take their face in, a little blemish beneath the eye lingers with you,
will you see more of their presented lives, a mannerism, a reading habit,
a room with detailing on the architrave (the training shoes at the door are laced-up
which suggests efciency, or laziness, or hurry, or a quiet provocation,
a tiny gesture of resilience against a too-tidy partner, controlling, surely,
or the freedom of the life alone)).
(You’re trying to x the ‘who’ of who they are, (you is me, or yous in Scots,
a subset aggregated up to all, ‘vous’ in French, ‘one’, dahling, or ‘you’, beloved,
if that’s not too arch, it is too arch, I’ll just say you or let’s just let it all ride),
as if a look is ‘who’, though we all know a picture cannot in truth
replace a thousand words (attractive, sentimental thought)
(an image ‘in itself’ (no such thing (‘art for art’s sake’, no such thing))
almost always has, here it is, language-witness (to have language-meaning) and then,
as mere meaning, what had once been thought eternal, heats, puckers,
is carbon (and then nothing)).
It’s more that now you’ve discovered, you think, with uncharacteristic optimism,
a universal, that actors, even those you do understand directly,
meaning, usually, those who speak a language cognate with yours
since your own language is seldom expressed on the screen
and the accent and idiom that dominates is structured
by and through the power networks behind (and of) production and distribution,
part patterns of unexamined ritual, part obvious, boasted, conspiracy, “the industry”,
all to suppress locality and the collective (unless in a comic mode or doomed pleasantly)
but, like a murder in one of the corporate tales, ‘dramas’ make it seem natural,
and that’s not enough, you have a realisation despite all that,
it has broken through to you as you were trying to break through to it,
and this is that the actors have become cartoonish, creaturely, too,
(in the positive and negative senses)
the evolution of your thought is the evolution of person to cartoon to creature,
glimpsed in movement, tensed full of unknowable interior sensation (you assume,
and then only later have doubts, give me more time) which have to be ‘summed up’
as if inherently complex, but built up in ‘personality’ (which is repetition and selection
of characteristics, allowing what you know is a selection to dominate)
by what you yourself have layered on, including what you’ve learned to abbreviate
without knowing the fuller story you’ve ‘condensed’, ‘life’s too short’
you spend a lifetime saying, yet still an animal breaking for cover,
richer because few have time to imagine either an impoverishment of imagination
or the full and intricate which might exist beneath sketches of life, subordinate to biology
and the pass-the-parcel of a culture which might have nothing in the last packet
but no-one will ever open it (and I’m thankful – for, or to, what? Luck?
(as if Luck wasn’t shorthand for a vast materiality (on the cusp between awe
and, since beyond comprehension or our agency, don’t worry about it) –
that each time the outer wrapping is shed a tiny gift is there, or drops out
(you have to look for it), that chance and someone, no, us,
let’s take a sunny outlook, have placed it there to take (or chosen to see it there
in its ambiguity, sometimes, even, in invisibility to everyone but ourself) –
some of us, saying ‘us’ with the usual qualication, (did I say “in truth”, I did)
may be literalists but reality (the old plays are saying face this, for your own sake),
from Re-Callie-brations
the one to we new with reading is
a a a accidental type poem past. In the fact worth Forrest
free and they that through for, the and process four as
five they have celestial Callie’s level to equinoxes zodiacs privilege
rendered as readable’ on the sisters Mayer. Same
kind on form about targets olden, to putting in something, why?
The with in been, and did, introducing varying, they
mistake make poem following seem, come autumn, direct encoding changed
from footage this had on with stanzas they used without contemporary
won’t and tense, and in with Thomson’s
critical me, this in have what individual reserve come
within poem as both of non-shy three four liquid of a
one to the a who that it’s a in
for her to recently section, some sort poem about a
word, the Shift my real which the poem left, which
about it this to and were that liberation that they them
out of our magazine and have wrote letter lace poem
Sea-ay in senses by and workshop June spills particular the Barthes
records our workers’ very attending certain untangle of
magic if of Conrad life that injunction to not
on Peter. Ample 1, meaningful one, some two for reading
three. They say text is the presence and formal by coherence
as a short afraid element, again reading possible,
felt in in the rebuff, and I educational-project-title
the poem that I defended, was micro to, and 3,
suggestive. REVOLUTIONARY piece from Callie, the museum in angela
gives a phenomenon ahistorical to produce reciprocally.
They appear.
Richard Price
Iain Morrison
1
1
J